As was explained in part one of this post, following what is said or written about American politics is often difficult for Americans who are actually used to all the dissembling, spinning, deliberate misconstruing, hyperbole and other nonsense that is to spin facts and lies into glittering campaign finery.

But if you are not from the U.S., it's next two impossible to know what's important or what's not.  Given the central role America still plays in the world -- G-zeroists notwithstanding -- cutting through the headlines and the soundbites to get to the core truths about what's happening in the world's highest-priced democracy is essential.

That's why I've tried to pick out a few terms and explain what each party means by them.  Earlier this week, I visited the Republican lexicon.  Today, we'll take a look at a handful of key illustrations of the quirks and curiosities that comprise the Dem dialect, with a special focus on a few that pertain to foreign policy.

The 1 Percent -- This is a perjorative term of art for every rich, spoiled, corrupt, indolent, exploitative millionaire in America who is not a donor to the Obama reelection effort or the Democratic National Committee.  Donors are referred to as hard-working, job-creating illustrations of the enduring power of the American dream.  (Also understood to refer to those who should be shouldering burden for balancing U.S. budget by paying "their fair share" of taxes.)

The 99 Percent -- This refers to the disenfranchised, struggling victims of Wall Street and corporatist exploitation.  All these people deserve tax cuts, to be funded by the 1 percent.  The fact that there is no way to address the deficit without a bigger burden falling on most of the members of the 99 percent, too, is just not something that should be discussed in public until we are in the midst of robust recovery lest the truth and arithmetic derail everything.

Bush Tax Cuts -- Source of all problems in the U.S. economy, even though President Obama celebrated extending them as a canny political victory in the middle of his first term.  (Also known as the biggest political issue of December 2012.)

Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security -- The Holy Trinity of American politics.  They are sacrosanct and must never be touched -- even if major surgery is the only way to actually save their lives.

Financial Services Reform -- A political mirage allowing the president to seemingly take a tough stand against the 1 percent while not alienating too much the fat cats who are needed to pump money into Dem coffers.  Advocate it, sign it, but don't really overdo the enforcement side of it.

Campaign Finance Reform -- Something that is absolutely essential for restoring democracy in America, and which should be implemented just as soon as every currently serving Dem leaves office.

The President's Healthcare Victory -- Shhhh.  Please don't mention this.  Despite the fact that it actually benefitted millions, it is the Voldemort of Dem politics, "the policy whose name must not be spoken."

Romneycare -- Shhh.  Please don't mention this either.  Because as Dems, we'll be forced to admit we kinda like it.

The Unemployment Rate -- The president's true running mate (sorry, Joe.)  If it dips to around 8 percent or below, the president wins re-election.  Interesting fact: the president has almost no ability to impact this outcome and bares only a very limited responsibility for fluctuations in U.S. employment one way or another.

Europe -- Dem heaven.  An ability to balance the love of good cuisine with the love for a well-constructed government bureaucracy. Topless beaches. The fact that the eurocrisis probably will have more to do with whether Obama wins reelection than anything he or anyone in the U.S. might do compromises this love affair somewhat.

China -- Growing up, most Dem policy wonks wanted to be European, today they want to be Chinese. And we hate them for that. 

India -- China with democracy … really fractious democracy at that, and crazy, over-the-top, outspoken media chaos.   A fast growing developing country with an important strategic role and a historical past that gave us Ben Kingsley.  In other words, for visionary Dem foreign policy types, even better than Europe or China.  The ultimate destination/partner for the Dem wonkocracy.

The Middle East -- Er, nice to know ya, time to go, "yay, democracy," "boo, Iran," "love ya, Israel" ... we're out of here.

"Barack Obama has a good working relationship with Bibi Netanyahu" -- Ha.  

"It would be wrong to politicize the successful results of the Bin Laden raid" -- Let's play up this big success at every opportunity that arises.  Wanna bet the story of the Navy SEAL who pulled the trigger leaks closer to election day?  Best illustration of Dem cojones since Madeleine Albright first raised the possibility they might exist.

Mark Wilson/Getty Images

 

BLUE13326

7:51 PM ET

January 6, 2012

Job creation -- getting

Job creation -- getting Americans so discouraged that they stop looking for work and drop off the official unemployment figures and lower the unemployment rate.

 

BGFNDPA98FSA

12:46 AM ET

January 7, 2012

very good web: ===

very good web: === http://www.plzzshop.com

The website wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike, jordan, prada, also including the jeans, shirts, bags, hat and the decorations.

All the products are free shipping, and the the price is competitive, and also can accept the paypal payment., After the payment, can ship within short time.

We will give you a discount

WE ACCEPT PYAPAL PAYMENT

YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!

=== http://www.plzzshop.com

thank you!!!

Believe you will love it.

We have good reputation, fashion products,

come here quickly== http://www.plzzshop.com

Opportunity knocks but once

 

THEMADCAP

12:49 AM ET

January 7, 2012

Compromise

Compromise: giving the GOP 95% of what they want.

 

GRANT

8:20 AM ET

January 7, 2012

Alright, that one got a

Alright, that one got a chuckle out of me.

How about these?

Insurgency: Bipartisan. What we say when we really mean civil war but don't want to admit that's what it is.

Civil war: Bipartisan. What definitely isn't happening in any nation we give a d*mn about because it might suggest that both sides have some legitimacy in different parts of the country. Civil wars only happen at least one hundred years ago.

Rebels: Bipartisan. Insurgents (who definitely aren't having a civil war) that we like.

Insurgents: Bipartisan. Rebels (who definitely aren't having a civil war) that we don't like.

U.N Peacekeeping mission: Bipartisan. Act of sending too few soldiers who probably don't have authority to return fire into a warzone*, giving them insufficient political backing, too few funds and no guarantee of vital things like helicopters or clear objectives and calling it a day.

Sovereignty: Bipartisan. Demanding no one interfere in one nation's affairs while seeking to interfere in another nation's affairs.

Genocide: Bipartisan. Definition 1: The horrible actions being committed in that nation over there that everyone needs to stop right now.
Definition 2: The actions which may or may not be occurring based on uncertain reports which in no way require us to commit money, political weight or soldiers to and we should not be expected to maintain any interest in the subject once the reporters go away.

Reset button: Bipartisan. Act of stating that relations with a nation that may or may not be hostile will start fresh and new while being utterly unable to actually do that and hoping that no one ever notices.

Maybe I should write a second Devil's Dictionary.

* I only wish I were making that one up.

 

GRANT

8:11 AM ET

January 7, 2012

I suspect that no Republican

I suspect that no Republican or Democrat is actually taking a close look at India. If they did they would notice several things. Government and elite corruption is astounding, even by non-Western standards. There are multiple insurgencies going on, several of which are getting particularly dangerous. Both national parties are at best unpleasant if looked at too closely. India only seems interested in working with the U.S on China and nothing else (seriously people, look at it's U.N voting habits and opinion on sanctions).

 

PEREUBU2000

5:48 PM ET

January 7, 2012

Interestng ... just joking

What a hateful, but thankfully short, litany of Neo-Con thinking points. Where did FP dig up this hateful troll and install him as a columnist? Is David Horowitz the editor of this rag? Well, after a couple of weeks of giving FP a chance, its back to the Guardian and the Economist, Dawn and the Times of India. At this rate I give your magazine another year or so, maximum. There was that hateful piece on Pakistan and Imran Khan yesterday by some chippie who couldn't get her facts right on Memogate, Khan or Mr. Bhutto, and now this inept screed by a bilious ideologue. Evidently FP will print anything.

 

KUNINO

3:12 PM ET

January 9, 2012

Could Rothkopf possibly be that ignorant?

Probably not. So some more unpleasant words seems suitable to describe this nonsense. The Dems don't seem to think that tax cuts for the 99 percent should be paid for by higher taxes on the one percent. And they don't seem to think that the Bush tax cuts are the source of all problems in the U.S. economy.

They do acknowledged sundry causes for the present difficulties and have presented expenditure cuts to reduce some. When it comes to analyzing why the economy is in its present difficulties, Dems certainly argue that the Bush tax cuts, the costs of two wars that seem to have been both unnecessary and unsuccessful, and a bloated federal administration have combined to produce the present near-crisis. Ron Paul is far from the only honest Republican who admits that US presidents of all stripes usually bloat the federal administrations; GWB, it seems, was one of the worst of them.

 

David Rothkopf is the CEO and Editor-at-Large of Foreign Policy. His new book, "Power, Inc.: The Epic Rivalry Between Big Business and Government and the Reckoning that Lies Ahead" is due out from Farrar, Straus & Giroux on March 1.

Read More