Posted By David J. Rothkopf Share

Once the heartfelt emotion unleashed by the death of Osama bin Laden and the deserved appreciation for the accomplishment of the U.S. military, intelligence community, and Obama and Bush Administration officials who made this possible passes, what will we be left with?

First, we will be left with the uncomfortable realization that what has happened is the most important event of 2001.  It changes almost nothing about today's world. That which was a threat, remains a threat.  The risks we faced in the Middle East and elsewhere remain roughly as they were.  We are still leaving Iraq, still edging to the exit in Afghanistan (albeit with a clearer "mission accomplished" sense about us...even if the Taliban, al Qaeda, and other new extremist threats remain in the region).  Countries rocked by unrest such as Libya and Yemen, still contain threats from al Qaeda cells within and near to their borders.  And the biggest most important national security concerns we have are totally unrelated to al Qaeda in whatever form it exists today.

Second, I said it changes almost nothing.  One thing that has clearly changed, whether we are willing to acknowledge it or not, is our relationship with Pakistan.   Given the location in which bin Laden was found, literally right under the noses of the Pakistani military and the government, in a large, suspicious facility not an hour away from the capital, our already dwindling trust for the Pakistanis, and in particular for their intelligence service must now be acknowledged to have evaporated altogether.  While no doubt a number of heroic and dependable true friends in Pakistan helped with this operation, clearly others in very high places were behind protecting bin Laden for years and years.

Further, the fact that we struck independently deep into the heart of Pakistan will not sit well with many in that country, further worsening the relationship.

Given that during the past few years Pakistan has reportedly very dramatically increased their nuclear weapons arsenal, and that at best, they are a schizophrenic ally -- and it is very hard to use that word without gagging on it, we must today acknowledge that the greatest threat to U.S.  security was not killed yesterday but instead remains as it was, the country in which he died.  That's not to say that it is the government of Pakistan per se or even the majority of the Pakistani people, but rather the threat lies with the tens of millions who are deeply hostile to us, the extremists they cultivate, shelter, fund, and facilitate, and the elements within the government who are perilously close to weapons that, should they ever fall into the wrong hands, would pose a threat that will make us forget today's celebrations very quickly.

AFP/Getty Images

 

STILLWATER

3:06 PM ET

May 4, 2011

Change has come

I feel badly for you that you don't yet realize that the Bush administration is not in office, having departed in January of 2009.

And to maintain a petty insistence that these officials, out of power for two years, could have had anything to do with the operation that concluded Sunday morning betrays a lack of intelligence that is rather alarming.

What the former president could not do in 7 years and 4 months, the current one handily completed in a mere 2 years and 3 months.

 

BLUE13326

3:50 PM ET

May 4, 2011

I don't know...it's

I don't know...it's encouraging that even the left in this country is willing to do this kind of targeted operation that is clearly a violation of international law, and maybe even better than the right. It's a sign of vitality that is very much needed.

 

BILLMAXMAN

7:02 PM ET

May 7, 2011

Now It's Time for Sane Leaders to Talk

Osama bin Laden was an evil man and the world is better off without him. Like Hitler and other sociopaths throughout history, he destroyed not only his declared enemies, but his own followers whom he used as fodder in an ill-conceived war.

I learned of bin Laden, like most other Americans, on September 11, 2001. I had taken the day off from work and was doing some routine cleaning at home. Even that routine seemed precious after that attack as I worried about my wife and son who were at work and school respectively in the Washington DC area.

When I heard the news over the weekend about bin Laden's death, I had just completed some research for www.fullmovieonlinev.com, another routine task. The death of Osama bin Laden connected these points in time for me, and while not as jubilant as many others, I felt a sense that justice had been done and that another madman had been removed from our ranks.

I don't think this is time for nationalistic chest beating, but rather a time for Americans to demand that our government do whatever it can to push for a just resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian issue. Until that is resolved, we will always have problems with the Arab world. Osama is gone, but there will undoubtedly be other hate-filled men eager to take his place.

Sun Tzu said that war is too expensive to wage just for war's sake; that the purpose of war is to make the enemy willing to talk to you. We have a window of opportunity to do that now. Ultimately, this East-West conflict will not be solved by bullets, explosives and daring special op missions, but by brave, sane leaders willing to confront tough issues and reach agreements that recognize that all of us, whether Palestinian, Israeli, American or whatever, have the right to live in peace, safety and dignity.

 

MARTY MARTEL

10:06 PM ET

May 10, 2011

Pakistani government has U. S. by the throat

Now that Osama bin Laden has been found to be being sheltered so close to the heart of Pakistani government, foreign policy establishment in U. S. is in the full swing to once again rescue Pakistan from getting a black eye over it.

It does NOT matter to these Pakistani apologists that Islamabad has been caught with their pants down umpteen times.

Pakistan has been able to get away with all the crimes against U. S. and still come out smelling roses because
Pakistani government has U. S. by the throat. US can NOT use its aid leverage to force Pakistan to stop supporting terrorist groups who kill US/NATO troops in Afghanistan day in and day out because US needs Pakistan’s help in ferrying supplies to those very US/NATO troops.

Furthermore Pakistan has spread a biggest malarkey with U. S. connivance that ’nuclear weapons are in danger of falling in the hands of Islamic fundamentalists if Pakistani government collapses’.

How can Pakistan be in danger of falling to the Islamic fundamentalists if Pakistani Army and ISI are SPONSORING those very Islamic fundamentalists led by Osama bin Laden, Haqqani, Mullah Omar and Hafiz Saeed as reported by ambassador Patterson?

Previous US ambassador Anne Patterson to Pakistan, wrote in a secret review in 2009 that ‘Pakistan's Army and ISI are covertly SPONSORING four militant groups - Haqqani‘s HQN, Mullah Omar‘s QST, Al Qaeda and LeT - and will not abandon them for any amount of US money‘, as diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks show.

No matter how Hillary Clinton spins it, ambassador Patterson had NO reason to mislead her own State Department and U. S. government.

US just keeps deliberately ignoring Taliban’s Pakistani connections in fueling and sustaining Afghan insurgency as reported by Matt Waldman in ‘The sun in the sky‘ on 6/13/2010, corroborated by WikiLeaks leaks on 7/25/2010 and then further corroborated by Chris Alexander, Canadian ambassador to Afghanistan from 2003 to 2005 and Deputy Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for Afghanistan from 2005 until 2009 in his article on 7/30/2010 titled ‘The huge scale of Pakistan‘s complicity‘.

Let us see if U. S. once again allows Pakistan to get away with a whitewash and a wink and a nod with few more billions in aid to boot after finding out that Osama bin Laden was sheltered so close to the heart of Pakistani government.

 

David Rothkopf is the CEO and Editor-at-Large of Foreign Policy. His new book, "Power, Inc.: The Epic Rivalry Between Big Business and Government and the Reckoning that Lies Ahead" is due out from Farrar, Straus & Giroux on March 1.

Read More