Friday, July 24, 2009 - 7:06 PM

Take it from me, there is only one certain method for determining whether someone is from New Jersey or not: They will refer to a trip to the beach as going "down the shore." However, the handcuffs are another dead giveaway.
Once again, my home state has been thrust into the limelight in a massive corruption case that involves a failed philanthropist named Solomon Dwek who lived, appropriately enough in a town called Deal (which is, as any Jerseyite knows, "down the shore"), a guy from Brooklyn named Levy-Izhak Rosenbaum who could get you a slightly used pancreas for a good price, a bunch of rabbis who laundered money through charities they controlled, cash from Israel, bankers in Switzerland, the mayors of Hoboken and Jersey City (where it is fair to say this case is not the first to offer a whiff of scandal), a member of Governor Jon Corzine's cabinet and a host of other bit players who you might find milling around catching a smoke outside the Vince Lombardi Service Area on the New Jersey Turnpike.
Dwek, (pronounced in much the same way Barbara Walters would pronounce "dreck" which is the Yiddish word for shit), is now somewhere in the witness protection system (hopefully for his sake in the custody of Marshall Mary Shannon as played in "In Plain Sight" by the irresistible Mary McCormack.) Seeking to save his own skin after getting caught floating a bad check for $25 million, our guy Solomon-the-wise...er...guy, started helping the Feds round up corrupt pols.
One big-time Fed anti-corruption prosecutor called New Jersey the most corrupt state in the nation. (Which is probably true since technically, the District of Columbia is not a state.) Jon Corzine, who has a tough election race later this year that just got tougher, said "Any corruption is unacceptable-anywhere, anytime, by anybody. The scale of corruption we're seeing as this unfolds is simply outrageous and cannot be tolerated."
Noble words. But has Mr. Corzine so quickly forgotten his roots either in Washington or at Goldman Sachs? While the colorful cast of slimeballs arrested yesterday has restored pride of place to my home state in the corruption league tables, let's face it, what was really shocking about the reported payoffs was that the prices were so low. This was penny ante stuff. Ten grand for a building permit. That kind of thing. It can't hold a candle to the millions that are pumped into the campaigns of federal politicians who guide laws subtly this way and that or turn bills into Christmas trees of goodies for key constituents or who simply look the other way when oversight is concerned...for example, in the case of the financial community. Just for example, Governor.
There are cultural and definitional hurdles we need to get over with regard to the corrosive effects of buying and selling influence in our society. Corruption is offensive when it involves $97,000 stuffed in a box of Apple Jacks cereal as in this latest New Jersey case...but dress it up in the finery of federal campaign finance laws designed to institutionalize the power of the few and its suitable for high society senatorial or presidential fundraisers in Hollywood, Houston, or the Hamptons.
I call this later phenomenon "corruption within the law." And it as many times more pernicious than payoffs in diners in Bergen County as it is more expensive ... even if it doesn't quite invoke the backroom at Bada Bing or Satriale's quite as evocatively. That's because the effects are so much more widely felt in society ... as in the case of Wall Street selling the view that it didn't need much regulation or that it needed cheap money bailouts or in the case of the oil and auto industries rental of the levers of U.S. energy policy for the past several decades.
But I guarantee you that tonight America's most trusted newsman (which according to a new TIME Magazine poll is Jon Stewart...who is neither a newsman nor does he actually represent himself as being trustworthy, quite the contrary) will devote time on his show to tape or pictures of the perp walk of the five dirty rabbis or the car loads of mayors and assemblyman as if they were the face of corruption in America. Which may be appropriate because they are as much about comedy and as far from the real story as is "The Daily Show."
Nonetheless, the real uncovered corruption aside, as a Jersey boy, there is something irresistible about this particularly tale. It's the bastard short story of Mario Puzo and Philip Roth (with a hint of Damon Runyon by way of Sholom Aleichem) and who can object to that. Further, we take pride in our scumbags in New Jersey.
In fact, that reminds me ... earlier this week I was having lunch with FP supremo Moises Naim at the Palm Restaurant in Washington.
While we lunched on rare tuna salads while Lord knows what kind of nasty deals were being cut in the booths nearby, we got into a discussion of just this subject of corruption. Moises, author of the book Illicit -- recently turned into an Emmy-nominated documentary -- and thus an expert on all things sleazoid and able to say the word "bagman" in 80 languages, argued that whatever flavor our corruption took in the U.S., the Venezuelas and Russias had us beat hands down. I muttered a few words about my theories about our sanitized versions of buying and selling politicos but he scoffed. He's from Caracas and he likes his violation of the public trust big and loud and ideally involving low-life political thugs of the type who rule his home country.
Well, look at the scoreboard, my friend! We are from New Jersey and we are loud and we are proud! We've got it all. The baby-faced golden boy of Hoboken politics, the new mayor, heading to the slammer practically before he is old enough to shave. An 87 year-old Syrian rabbi. A special lingo in which payments were "invitations" and approvals were "opportunities." We're slicing people open and selling freaking body parts for chrissakes (although due to Kashrut laws you couldn't get, say, a kidney and a pound of cheese from the same guy).
So Mr. Glamorous expert on the underbelly of globalization, who's corrupt now? Boo-ya, my friend! Fuggedaboutit.
Jeff Zelevansky/Getty Images
All the Jewish references (including "dreck") make this article look rather anti-semitic.
This is certainly the first time I have been accused of appearing anti-semitic since starting this blog...or in my life. Read back into the blog...semitic I am...semitic I am proud to be...semites I love. I am however anti-sleazeball...regardless of ethnic origins of the sleazeballs in question and that may have been what gave you the impression that these particular drecksters were not my faves.
1) Well, are there references in this blog to the arrogance of WASPs, dirtiness of Irish or the color of Mr. President and his pastor? Different people feel differently the boundary between sleaziness and political correctness
2) I agree that being semitic does allow some liberty of expression in this respect, but I think that journalist integrity should stop you from playing into the hands of an anti-semitic audience, even if it may score you extra points.
I think the last point is especially interesting: it is a hard moral choice that many public figures (for example, Rahm Emanuel, or Sergei Kirienko - a prominent democratic figure in Russia, who nowadays, as the head of Russian nuclear agency, supervises building of nuclear facilities in Iran).
It's tricky avoiding Jewish references in a story that includes Rabbis selling body parts as part of a International (Israel included) Money Laundering Racket.
just sayin'
The whole thing is unfortunate, truly. Massive exploitation and greed. Even Hollywood wouldn't dream this sh^t up.
Yes, Rothkopf did cross the line.
I had some trouble deciding whether this was simply humorous (parts were, though only a Jew could get away with it, just as some jokes tweaking themselves can only be told by Blacks).
So I read the piece several times.
I come down on the side that whether consciously or unconsciously the piece WAS anti-semitic. This is so because some of the Jewish references attempting humor were not only gratuitous in the context of the story but also factually incorrect. The most blatant example is:
"(although due to Kashrut laws you couldn't get, say, a kidney and a pound of cheese from the same guy)."
factually incorrect. The most blatant example is:
"(although due to Kashrut laws you couldn't get, say, a kidney and a pound of cheese from the same guy)."
What is so incorrect about this statement?
Stressing the Jewish background of the culprits somehow implies a connection between their deeds and their Jewishness. All of them were also Americans, as reporters and politicians in some countries would be all too happy to stress. It is a dangerous path.
I have only two words for you: oy and vey. Relax. Judaism can withstand a few jokes in a blog. And in my view, given the circumstances of this case, if you can't laugh then you're not paying attention.
BTW, who was it that told you that I made any claims to have journalistic integrity? I'm not a reporter. I'm just a schmo with an Internet connection. If you don't like my sense of humor take comfort in my relative obscurity.
It all seems a little late to me. So where were the Feds 25 years ago when Hoboken residents lived in terror from years of arson-suspected fires burning the way clear for all the new development? Has anybody conducted a body-count now that it's over and the Governor moved into town?If bribe prices were also low back in the 80s then the sheer volume must have made some folks quite wealthy...blood real estate. Those of us who lived through the "Hoboken diaspora" knows there was nothing penny ante about it.
As a former legislator of a small northern NJ town that has seen not one but TWO mayors go to jail (involving extortion and bribery with one of the big "familias"), and countless other municipal "professionals" arrested/indicted/investigated/etc, all I can say is what took you so long and what are you waiting for to arrest the rest. Governor Corzine came into office promising sweeping reform and an end to business as usual courtesy of the "legal" pay-to-play campaign contribution system we have in our fine state. While I applaud his choice of State Senator Weinberg for Lt. Gov -she has been anti-pay-to-play from day one- I can't help but wonder if Christie, with his 100% conviction track record as former US Attorney, wouldn't be a better choice. Let's face it, NJ is beyond broke, and that is just a moist breeding ground for greedy developers and greedier, amoral pols. Worst of all though, is that private citizens don't stand a chance, and forget trying to be an honest "public servant"; you'll get sued, your property will be vandalized, and your family will be targeted (speaking from personal experience...).
Ah, and regarding the "tone" of the post (Mr. Rothkopf, antisemitic? Puh-lease!), sounds like some of the readers are being perhaps a tad too antisemantic... No disrespect intended!!
This kind of corruption is a favorite whipping boy of my campus's branch of the College Republicans. Our dear state is broke, hence rising tuitions at my publicly-funded university. Why is it broke? According to them, corrupt politicians (i.e., corrupt Democrats). Yet I have to wonder if corruption like what we saw this week costs the public all that much, no matter how spectacular it may seem. Or would it be like the billions of dollars of earmark spending in Congress: spectacular, even gratuitous, but relatively inconsequential in comparison to the total budget - merely an easy target politically. After all, saying you're against corruption is like saying you're against theft or murder.
In any case, the arrest we should be waiting for is political boss Joe Cryan. Granted, I suspect that this too would be mere political spectacle, but everyone needs to see something spectacular every once in a while.
Of course it's a real problem. Pay-to-play is nothing more than a corruption tax that is then passed on to Joe and Jane taxpayer. Look, if you are a developer and want to build a highrise with 90 units when only 45 are allowed, you grease your way through the approval process with just a couple of grand (usually, as we've read, only about $5K or 10K). And this happens numerous times in your municipality and exponentially across municipalities all over the state. What's the cost to you and me? Infrastructure and services. More police and firemen and teachers and DPW workers. Your taxes then go up and, to boot, your quality of life goes down. Small developments, large developments (can you say Xanadu??) this is not a Democrat or Republican problem, this is a GREED problem, no matter what kind of reptile they are...
And this is no different than what occurs on the national stage. How do you think healthcare got to be such a mess? Pharma lobbyists jamming cash under legislators noses who were only preoccupied with funding their next reelection. It's a disgusting system, and until someone figures out how to get favoritism and nepotism out of politics, then we'll all just be stuck with nothing more than the occasional "spectacular" arrest. Not Good Enough.
'although due to Kashrut laws you couldn't get, say, a kidney and a pound of cheese from the same guy'
Thats why they needed a rabbi, so at least the secondhand parts were kosjer
ps; I would love to translate this into Dutch to put it on my blog. Nobody in Holland would care about corruption in New Jersey. But the article is written very well.
David Rothkopf is the CEO and Editor-at-Large of Foreign Policy. His new book, "Power, Inc.: The Epic Rivalry Between Big Business and Government and the Reckoning that Lies Ahead" is due out from Farrar, Straus & Giroux on March 1.
Read More
(13)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE