Tuesday, July 7, 2009 - 4:33 PM

Millions of you turn to this blog site every day because you feel I will offer you insights that will help you make sense of the world. I know this. It's a humbling responsibility. And frankly, the enormity of it forces me to offer a confession. Today I reviewed the morning papers as I usually do (online, sans paper) and watched the early broadcasts of TV news organizations and I have got to admit it, I find everything pretty confusing.
For instance:
David McNew/Getty Images
EXPLORE:CHINA, CORRUPTION, CULTURE, ECONOMICS, FINANCIAL CRISIS, HUMAN RIGHTS, IRAN, NUKES, OBAMA ADMINISTRATION, RUSSIA
Where do yo get the information that the victoms are Muslims? As far as I know (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jul/06/china-uighur-urumqi-victims-deaths), most of dead/wound victoms are Han Chinese. It is Uighurs who were killing Han. A genocide to against Han.
The story I read this morning was unclear on this point. But I did a little digging and it seems there have been deaths on both sides. So I will make a change to the posting...and I thank you for the heads up.
Because if memory serves the Chinese police only gave a death toll (and who knows if it's remotely accurate), they never divided it into victims, police, rioters, and which rioters. Aside from that, may I remind you that Han Chinese have been photographed walking en masse towards Uighur sections armed with large sticks, knives, and iron bars just as Uighur Chinese have towards Han Chinese. It isn't as though one side has a clear moral high ground in this regard.
Currently people need a little bit more logic and intelligence to read newspaper. Read the topic "...seek revenge..." If the Han people have not been killed, why do they need to seek revenge? And the following report also said that the security forces stopped the people taking matters in their own hands and separated the both sides on the street.
I also wonder why you just notice that picture.
http://www.zonaeuropa.com/20090706_1.htm
Here is the link with latest update of picture and video. If you drag to the bottom, there is something really funny and sad.
Han Chinese = Government-sponsored mob.
After all, Han Chinese are the ruling class, make up like 90% of the population of China, and the Communists preach Han racial superiority, right?
The Communists used these same tactics to quell unrest in Tibet.
Not necessarily government sponsored, I'd consider it more likely that if the local government has decided on a policy it would be to not interfere with such things.
@Zjin: My point wasn't that Han Chinese hadn't been killed by rioters (I'd be very surprised if they hadn't), it was that it is not just a case of Uighur's attacking Han. Declaring it to be as simple as that only means that there will be flawed data and similar incidents in the future. Personally I wish I could be on the ground to see with my own eyes how the police are handling this, I generally prefer to consider police statements (from any nation) only one source of information and not necessarily the most accurate.
Sorry but you are totally wrong.
The Communist government does not preach Han racial superiority. Do not take it for granted that this racial superiority preach thing happening elsewhere in other countries is also happening in China. Actually the Communists preach the equality of all the residing 56 ethnic groups.
Practically, to compensate for their disvantages because of their less population percentage, the government issues loads of regulations and orders that favor the minorities very much.
Zjin knows China, he would agree with me.
and that's why the uighurs and tibetans have been subjugated for decades by the han chinese? what f'ing fantasyland are you living in?
SICK of china's BS.
What's the weird world do you live in? There are more than 2 minorities in China. Last time I check, officially there are 56. Politically, minorities are treated better: there are quotes for them in government and they got extra points in the college entry exam. You know how many Han students would change the race background on their ID card to become a "minority" to get these extra points. If there is a discrimination, it is a reverse discrimination.
Yes, they are poor relative to Han, mostly because of the poor education and language barrier. Seriously, if you cannot speak the official language fluently in your country , you probably are not going anywhere, statistically speaking. Besides the language, their circumstances are no different from poor Han Chinese. Rich-Poor gap in China is great and dangerous, that is another topic.
You apparently know close to nothing about what the reality is in China. Or you are brainwashed by the ignorant and oversimplified MSM. Totally arrogant BS IMO.
yes, thanks for that official tally mr jin. also your comment on MSM brainwashing is particularly rich, coming from a defender of the communist government in china. as an aside, i moved to china about a month after the tiananmen massacre, and i'm sure the Western MSM couldn't have done half the job the chinese government has done in convincing a whole generation of chinese that it never happened. that's the great thing about totalitarianism - if you're on top.
as for your ludicrous point about minorities being "treated better," i am well aware that minorities are nominally favoured by china's silly college entry exam, and just as cognizant of the fact that this is a meaningless red herring constantly trotted out by the oppressive classes the world over, particularly in china (and india).
Frankly I couldn't care less about Jackson, yes his music may have been very talented but that means little to me. I understand that many people worldwide cared quite a bit about him, and so the state of California has little choice in the matter. As for the charges brought against him, I think that reflection will show that most famous people when they die are only remembered for any good things that they did and rarely the bad.
Adding to your list of ridiculously obvious headlines to cross my computer screen this morning was this one from The New York Times, "Interracial Roommates Can Reduce Prejudice". Thanks to Captain Obvious for that startling revelation.
David Rothkopf is the CEO and Editor-at-Large of Foreign Policy. His new book, "Power, Inc.: The Epic Rivalry Between Big Business and Government and the Reckoning that Lies Ahead" is due out from Farrar, Straus & Giroux on March 1.
Read More
(12)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE