Wednesday, June 10, 2009 - 6:13 PM

Developing further my Airport Theory of Foreign Relations, it is impossible not to marvel at the creativity and industry of the Indians. Arriving after an eight-and-one half-hour-long flight from that shopping mall from Hell also known as Heathrow Terminal Five, we raced into Mumbai for a meeting. Naturally, we were seething with hostility after bad treatment and flying here on what seemed to be the original Boeing 777. In fact, parts seemed to be made from balsa wood suggesting they had been salvaged from earlier aircraft... a de Havilland Jenny for example.
At any rate, this is the kind of subtle undermining of international relations that our painfully inefficient and unpleasant system of connecting the globe produces. We were ready to be ugly Americans, well-prepared for the job both by circumstances and genetics.
So, what is rapidly expanding India -- today's papers announced that the country expects to grow in this global economic annus horibilis at the breathtaking rate of 7 percent -- to do with visitors like us? Answer: build in a cool-down period (no mean feat when the temperature is over 90 and everyone is nervously awaiting the arrival of the monsoon season). Where? The highway from the airport. A trip that should take 40 minutes took almost two hours. It was an exceptionally effective buffer. By the time we got to the hotel I could barely muster a sneer at the reception lady when she told me my room wasn't ready. Of course, I'll admit I was subdued somewhat by the sight of the gutted remnants of the terrorist gutted Oberoi which we passed on the way in. (And also by the security we had to pass through just to enter the lobby of this hotel.)
Admittedly, thanks to a tube strike, the city from which we came, London, is also offering massive traffic jams from the airport. The problem is they are also offering massive traffic jams to the airport. And they don't have anything like 7 percent growth to explain the rapidly growing number of cars on the motorways. Nor, of course, do they have anything like the slums that line the route into downtown Mumbai...but I'll admit it, despite the gut-wrenching deprivation in which the slum-dwellers live, it is hard to not to look around at cranes on the horizon or the ubiquity of cell phones (a phone line for life costs $2) or to think of the recent successful elections in this complex country of a billion and not think that India has the wind at its back at the moment. That doesn't minimize the social challenges but it clearly gives a feeling of vitality and hope.
What a relief to be seeing the stories of Manmohan Singh's new government on the front page of the paper and not the stories from the front pages in my last stop noting the electoral success of the BNP, the racist, troglodyte British National Party. America elects an African American. Britain sends haters to the European Parliament. (What a relief that it is a useless organization.) Worse, the papers also noted similar recent right wing successes across Europe. For example the triumph of anti-gypsy nationalists in Hungary. Great to see Europe stepping up to meet the great challenges of our times with these creatures who have crawled out of the shallow end of the political cesspool.
That said, I can't say that I am that heartened by the news my blackberry keeps sending me from home, either. Can it really be that America is either surprised or interested that Adam Lambert is gay? (Really? Really?!) Can a Washington Post columnist actually be praising Obama for boldly taking a stance against Holocaust deniers (what next, a bold defense of Copernicus?), even as he seems to be allowing the country of those deniers to creep its way into the nuclear club? (If you don't see the irony here, write in and I will draw you a picture.)
Can the Obama administration really believe that merging Chrysler into Fiatis actually going to help either? Chrysler's best minds left after their last merger with Daimler Benz. Fiat doesn't have one single leading international brand. Is it really credible that if one of the world's most successful auto companies (Daimler Benz) couldn't save Chrysler that a combination of one of the world's most mediocre (Fiat) and a bunch of government guys who don't know anything about cars plus some union members who helped screw things up in the first place are going to do it?
Here in India, taxi drivers talk with palpable pride at the advent of the Tata Nano, a tiny car that is a source of great national pride. Business executives cite the ease with which they meet much higher average gasoline mileage targets than posed in the United States. I mean, I get it, this is a very poor country with a wide range of desperate needs (over 40 percent of Indians don't have access to electricity yet). But you've got to ask which way the trends are pushing us...and you also have to ask why the United States has not made a more urgent priority of dramatically strengthening relations with this country. Such a relationship could not be more central to containing the threat in Pakistan, counter-balancing China, promoting democracy and managing a whole host of global threats from climate to proliferation. To be perfectly honest, I think a lot more real and lasting (rather than symbolic and likely to be fleeting) good would be likely to come from President Obama making a trip to the land of Gandhi than his recent trip to the land of Mubarak and Nasser.
PAL PILLAI/AFP/Getty Images
Just a relatively minor point: It's not correct to call the BNP right-wing, at least as we in this country use the term. The BNP is for nationalisation, higher taxes, and protectionism; in fact, they siphoned voters from the left-wing Labour party, and the BNP found success in traditional Labour strongholds, such as Barnsley.
The BNP is actually far-left in much of its outlook; in fact, BNP leader Nick Griffin stated that his first speech before the EU parliament would address the scourge of privatization:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/video/2009/jun/08/bnp-mep-manchester
It's probably more useful if you're going to break the parties down on right and left, to say that UKIP is the right-wing eurosceptic party, and the BNP is actually a fascist party, which defies the usual right-left divide.
I agree with you on India; our improved relations was one of Bush's rare successes, but Obama seems uninterested so far.
It looks like the long journey from the airport to the hotel did not ease up your text hostility. Or the text was written at the airport (which is a bit difficult given that you describe the hotel)....
Fiat might not be a huge colossus in the US, but it is a very strong brand in many parts of the developing world. Look at Latin America.
And silly-sounding remarks by nevertheless important world characters send signals around the world. Otherwise, no one would write a line about the different faux pas of the current Pope.
I would just be more careful when writing under inner hostile conditions.
over 40 percent of Indians don't have access to electricity yet?
I don't think that is true!
The Obama administration, along with many Americans, seems to came to the conclusion that the absence of effective regulators is what led the financial sector to lose its marbles. This is a fully understandable, defensible position. But, the problem become how extensive such regulation should be.
In India, it is those areas of the economy that the government did not get involved in (Information technology) or decided to get out of the way (airlines and communications) that we see the most growth, in sales, employment, and innovative pricing for poor communities. In areas where the gov't still has a heavy hand, such as land and labor, we see the same problems in India that have been there for decades. With so many land use regulations, the only people who benefit are mobsters and the politicians in their pocket. By making it nearly impossible to fire workers once your company grows to a certain level, companies spend more money on labor saving technology (in country with millions of people looking for work) or worse, bonded labor and child slavery.
I don't know if you flew any of India's domestic airlines (Kingfisher, Jet) during your stay, but it reminds you of what flying could be. A pre-takeoff juice box (no alcohol), a lunch served even on a 90 minute flight, and then a light snack as you start to descend to your destination.
No electricity for over 40%???
Buddy, you are way off in these numbers. I belonged to rural india and I have to admit, forget Urban where India is thriving, MOST of the people in Rural India have electricity - some times even free!!!
Love it when someone calls me buddy...I assume I know them and we must be pals. Are we pals? Have we met? Or are you just being rude to add credibility to your point? As for the source of my number, it came from a senior executive at one of India's largest energy companies. It's a raw number, to be sure, and it may take into account those without access to power and those without access to sufficient power. But of course, my point was something else: there is still severe deprivation in India but nonetheless signs of progress are everywhere.
David Rothkopf is the CEO and Editor-at-Large of Foreign Policy. His new book, "Power, Inc.: The Epic Rivalry Between Big Business and Government and the Reckoning that Lies Ahead" is due out from Farrar, Straus & Giroux on March 1.
Read More
(6)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE