Although it's hard to believe, there have actually been developments this week that were more difficult to understand than the finale of Lost -- which is saying something since the show was roughly as incomprehensible as a boozy 3 a.m. chat with Lindsay Lohan.

We've had:

  • People actually listening to the rantings of James Carville, a man who has turned Tourette's Syndrome into a form of political analysis. This week it was about how the government should take over shutting down the Gulf oil spill despite the fact that literally no one in the government has the expertise to do so.
  • The U.S. still trying to undercut the benighted, ill-conceived and virtually certain not to work Brazilian-Turkish initiative with Iran in order to advance our own benighted, ill-conceived and virtually certain not to work sanctions program there.
  • The release of a national security strategy that could have easily saved much paper by simply using a photo of George W. Bush with a big red circle around it and a line through his face. What made the strategy -- which was an almost perfect snapshot of mainstream foreign policy conventional wisdom -- incomprehensible was not its content so much as it was the clear disconnect between that content and what the administration was actually going to be capable of or inclined to do.
  • The presentation of Exhibit A with respect to the aforementioned disconnect -- which was when Loveable Old Uncle Joe Biden then said we were on schedule to leave Iraq despite the fact that as the Post subhead put it: "U.S. expects to leave despite violence and political disarray." We seemed to have gone from the absurdity of "Mission Accomplished" to the pathos of "Mission Abandoned."
  • Bland Lee Dewyze beating gifted Crystal Bowersox on American Idol. Even more baffling: that the show will still be the most viewed television program in America this week despite the fact that it contains less healthy nutritional content than one of KFC's Double Down sandwiches. (That's the one that uses two pieces of fried chicken instead of bread ... and come to think of it, the fact that America eats crap like that sandwich and watches crap like "American Idol" actually not only makes perfect sense...it explains why we ended up with Bush as president and why, maybe, Obama's national security strategy was even necessary. Not much there but at least it is a kind of policy detox. Better for our blood pressure, fewer toxic additives, and a recognition that for a while we're going to have to be on a fat free diet if we want to regain our strength.)

If all that's confusing to you, brace yourself -- the summer ahead may prove to be a real head spinner. And more on that note in tomorrow's offering. Stay tuned... 

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Whether the deal brokered by Turkey and Brazil with Iran ultimately actually defuses the stand-off between Tehran and the international community remains to be seen. And even if it does, it seems unlikely to actually stop Ahmadinejad & Co. from continuing surreptitious efforts to cultivate nuclear weapons capability -- especially given the Iranians' decision to simultaneously announce that they will continue their enrichment program in any event. Indeed, it, like the sanctions program the United States has been engineering, seems more likely to simply hit the "pause" rather than the "reset" button, thus buying the one commodity the Iranians want most: time.

That said the effort is significant on another level. It represents the return of Plan B both to Middle Eastern and global relations. During the Cold War, international actors typically had a binary choice. They could seek the favor and advocacy of the East or the West, the Soviets or the Americans. Then, almost twenty years ago that all ended. And for a while it appeared, the choice was America or an international community that couldn't get its act together terribly effectively. 

But Turkey and Brazil working closely with Russia, India, and China, have effectively sent a message that Plan B has returned to the global equation. They have essentially said they didn't want to go along with the American approach to solving the problem (sanctions) and were vehemently against the Israeli approach (bombs away). The Turks in particular have been vocal with their BRIC partners in expressing their skepticism of the effectiveness of sanctions and their sense they would be very counterproductive.

The Iranians in turn seem to have recognized that the Brazil-Turkey deal is a win-win for them. It makes them look like they want to be constructive and thus takes the heat off of them and buys time. They get to tip the geopolitical scales in the direction of the relevance of emerging powers, tweak the U.S. efforts, and seemingly help usher in a new era in international diplomacy.

Something else vitally important to notice has happened here. This has become the first Middle Eastern stand-off in which the most important player from outside the region was China -- because China is the one country that had and has the power to determine whether or not a sanctions regime would work. The Chinese, while still internally debating just how much they want to lead on the international stage, have played this deftly so far. They have engaged in talks with the United States and with their BRIC plus one partners. They have evaluated. Behind the scenes they have been constructive and moderate with reports coming out of recent meetings among BRIC leaders that they have made the case for understanding the pressure that President Obama is under. And they have pressed the Iranians to make a deal while sharing like the others in the emerging power leadership a healthy skepticism of Iranian motives and likely compliance.

Thus this deal may seem smallish and technical from afar, but it could well signal a change in the way international diplomacy works. Certainly, it signals an intent on the part of a group of vitally important emerging powers not to be cowed by the "with us or against us" mindset that still permeates some in the U.S. foreign policy establishment.

ATTA KENARE/AFP/Getty Images

David Rothkopf is the CEO and Editor-at-Large of Foreign Policy. His new book, "Power, Inc.: The Epic Rivalry Between Big Business and Government and the Reckoning that Lies Ahead" is due out from Farrar, Straus & Giroux on March 1.

Read More